Sunday, February 20, 2011

Are religious maxims definitions or equilibria?

"There is no one so great or mighty that he can avoid the misery that will rise up when he resists and strives against God." - John Calvin

One thing I've always wondered about the aphorisms employed in churches is whether or not the speakers would endorse the reversal of that statement as a handle for living. For example, does the above phrase imply that someone mired in misery has been resisting and striving against God? Does an absence of misery imply the presence of God? If so, is reducing personal misery a workable spiritual kludge?

I can imagine how nonreligious would reply to this question, but I'm curious as to what religious people think.

Monday, February 7, 2011

Q: WHY ARE YOU FRIENDS WITH ASSHOLES YOU FUCK? WHAT KIND OF PERSON DOES THAT? (sic)

So it's about two weeks too late, but I will now take up the topic question for this post. Ironically, this comes on the heels (well, if you consider a month and a half "heels") of my previous faux launch post detailing my affection for my co-conspirators on this thing.

Though at first blush, this question seems unanswerable, or at the very least impossible to answer without contradicting my previous post and/or alienating some of my friends, I think this segues nicely into thinking about the ways we conceptualize human relationships.

The context for this question is in fact a direct quotation of a prior rhetorical question posed to me by a former person-of-ambiguous-relation to a close friend of mine in quasi-jokingly reference to that friend. After initially being taken aback, it also occurred to me that the simple answer to that question was "he's my friend" and that really is enough.

Fundamentally, I believe that everyone has both a lot of potential for good and a lot of potential for bad in them. We've presumably identified, witnesses, or hope for the good in those closest to us. But that doesn't mean that they don't have the same potential for bad, I suppose it all varies upon context.

I've formerly said that I can respect someone without liking them on the basis that no matter how much I personally dislike them, they are somebody's beloved son/daughter/mother/father/brother/sister/friend/whatever. And that really should be enough. Often times we're too dismissive of others because their views are incompatible with ours or they've done something to hurt us, but the truth of the matter is that at one point or another we've all been the "asshole."

Friendship must be based on a profound affection and loyalty that may sometimes seem antithetical to our own self-interest, and that perhaps is what makes it so beautiful. Entailed in that is knowing and believing that the good you saw in that person is there and helping to bring the best out in them. Hell, if all of my friends chose not to be friends with assholes then I'm willing to bet I wouldn't have a whole lot of friends left. But they chose to have faith in me as I do in them and it is a continuing source of pride, confidence, inspiration, and motivation.

I'm hard pressed to imagine a world where there weren't contexts in which people were getting hurt or feeling wronged by others. Cliche as it sounds, nobody can please everybody. Ultimately, it's that support and that belief of friendship that redeems these lapses in judgment or behavior.

-Yet to be Determined Alias

Friday, January 21, 2011

Q: What do you think of the portrayal of Obama in the wake of the Arizona shootings?

Okay, now I'm sorry I even brought up Arizona. I think this territory is pretty well covered. I think Sarah Palin is crazy, but we already knew that. I think the impulse for all of pinko-dom to blame the right wing is natural and misguided. Arbitrarily changing the question for myself: what do I think about the immediate polticization of the shootings? At first, it was, in fact, a little galling. But I think it would be better if we all had thicker skins and longer fuses. I agree with those that said that of course, if you shoot a politician, it's about politics. Let the dead bury their own dead. There's no use in skirting the pretense that, save a small number of those closely connected to the dead and wounded, this is all about those of us that are let.

Tuesday, January 4, 2011

Kick-Off

I suppose the only way this thing will ever get written in is if we all start contributing.

So I'll go first. Here's something I don't tell my friends enough, especially you three: thank you for always being there for me. You literally have no idea how much you mean to mean to me and how much you inspire me - perhaps because of my inability to communicate this.

It's been nearly ten years since high school and I still feel like our group of friends are some of the best people I've ever had the pleasure of calling a friend.

I've had some things on my mind lately, so I'll try and get around to posting them.

R

Friday, December 24, 2010

nothing isn't nothing, nothings something thats important to me

socrates: jeremyisahalfjew.blogspot.com is available

‪euthyphro: ‬ ‪hahahahaha
i think that might actually be perfect
because if anybody takes offense
we just say
you're reading into it
we just settled
on a verifiable fact
about one of us
rather than searching for a clever or witty name

‪socrates: ‬ ‪oneofusisahalfjew.blogspot.com is also available‬

euthyphro: ‬ ‪ohhh‬
that one may be better
so much mystery
surrounding who

socrates: ‬ ‪this may beat them all halfofjew.blogspot.com‬

‪euthyphro: ‬ ‪lol, i don't even know what that means‬
i like it

‪socrates: ‬ ‪or halfofjewrheart‬

‪euthyphro: ‬ ‪this is definitely a worthwhile venture‬
i've actually had a lot of things on my mind i've been meaning to write about

‪socrates: ‬ ‪have we told jeremy we're picking on him yet‬

‪euthyphro: ‬ ‪i'm sure he knows it's coming‬